Monday, October 27, 2014
Buddha on Two Views
“Monks, there are these two views: the view of being and the view of
non-being. Any recluses or priests who rely on the view of being, adopt the
view of being, accept the view of being, are opposed to the view of non-being.
Any recluses or priests who rely on the view of non-being, adopt the view of
non-being, accept the view of non-being, are opposed to the view of being.
"Any
recluses or priests who do not understand as they actually are the origin, the
disappearance, the gratification, the danger and the escape in the case of
these two views are affected by lust, affected by hate, affected by delusion,
affected by craving, affected by clinging, without vision, given to favoring
and opposing, and they delight in and enjoy proliferation. They are not freed
from birth, aging and death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief and despair;
they are not freed from suffering, I say.
"Any
recluses or priests who understand as they actually are the origin, the
disappearance, the gratification, the danger and the escape in the case of
these two views are without lust, without hate, without delusion, without
craving, without clinging, with vision, not given to favoring and opposing, and
they do not delight in and enjoy proliferation. They are freed from birth,
aging and death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief and despair; they are
freed from suffering, I say.”
(Buddha, taken from the Cula-sihanada Sutta, Majjhima Nikaya 11, Tipitaka. Notes: although
addressed to Buddhist monks & talking about recluses and priests, the above
is applicable to anyone; being and non-being can also be translated as
existence and non-existence; the crucial point here is that clinging to views
is an obstacle to enlightenment, which involves the complete letting go of all
views or beliefs.)
Friday, October 17, 2014
Dhammapada Reflection #3
Verses 6, 7 & 8:
There are those that do not realize
That one day we must all die.
But those that do realize this
Settle their quarrels.
For the pursuit of pleasures,
Who is uncontrolled in senses,
Immoderate in eating, indolent, and dissipated.
So Mara can never overpower the one
Who lives meditating on the impurities,
Who is controlled in his senses,
Moderate in eating, and filled
With faith and earnest effort.
We humans are an ingenious lot. We can
cure many fatal diseases, produce amazing works of art, and we can even walk in
space. And yet, we can also be pretty foolish, too. We endanger our health with
intoxicants, argue & inflict violence on each other, and live as if
immortal, avoiding the fact of our impending demise. Such ways of living do
immense damage both physically & psychologically, but Buddha suggests that
we can go beyond these destructive behaviour patterns.
A common exercise encouraged in Buddhism
is to reflect on our mortality. We are mortal beings; not only do these bodies
age & die, but also our minds do likewise. Indeed, it’s the nature of the
human mind to change moment-to-moment in the constant flow of thoughts &
feelings referred to as the stream of consciousness. Based in this fact, Buddha
suggests that if we are to take any part of us to be a ‘self,’ it should be the
body rather than the mind, for although the body is constantly changing, the
mind morphs from one state to another much faster; it is in constant flux.
Watch it for five minutes and you will see the truth of this.
Mara is the Buddhist figure that
represents death & ignorance; in other words, he is the antithesis of
Buddha. Rather than selfless, he is selfish, rather than egoless, he is
egotistic, and rather than compassionate, he is unsympathetic. Similarly, Mara
personifies those aspects of ourselves that are pleasure-seeking,
sense-gratifying & lazy. If we give in to these negative traits, we will be
unable to realize the fruits of the Buddhist life, for we will live as
followers of Mara and not Buddha. This is how Mara overpowers us, as spoken of
in verse 7 of the Dhammapada quoted above. Living in such negative ways, we
will surely live in conflict with others, over-competing with them, causing
arguments & hatred. In giving in to these harmful modes of behaviour we are
“weak trees,” as Buddha puts it, easily subject to further suffering based upon
the fake identities we foolishly live from.
Those that are heedful of Buddha’s
teachings are compared to a “rocky mountain” beyond the destructive powers of
any storm. He encourages us to meditate on “the impurities” which is a practice
intended to reveal the real nature of our bodies. The focus of such reflection
is such aspects of the body as bones, organs, membranes, fat, mucus &
faeces, not to mention other distasteful stuff. Controlling our senses by not
overindulging in sensual activities will also help in keeping Mara at bay.
Conviction & energy with regards to being moral & meditative will give
rise to the wisdom that transcends suffering & the delusion of self.
Living from the realization of the
impermanent nature of these body-minds can lead to a more positive attitude
towards life, not wasting so much effort on conflictive behaviours. We’re more
inclined to being tolerant & forgiving with each other if we recognize that
we’re all in the same boat called ‘Impermanence’ that will disembark at the
port named ‘Death.’ Being controlled in our actions and seeing the body as it
truly is can lead to a letting go of sense-indulgent & self-centred
activity, thus opening us up to the Dharma (the-way-things-are). All
this can not only make life more tolerable for us all, but also lead to that
realization of selflessness that Buddha called ‘nirvana.’
The Dhammapada ('Verses
of Dharma' or 'Path of Dharma') is an ancient Buddhist text that is said to
contain some of Buddha's teachings in poetic form. The first chapter is
called Yamakavagga, 'Chapter of Pairs,' and the above three verses are from
this part of the book.
There are those that do not realize
That one day we must all die.
But those that do realize this
Settle their quarrels.
Just as a storm throws
down a weak tree,
So does Mara overpower
the one who livesFor the pursuit of pleasures,
Who is uncontrolled in senses,
Immoderate in eating, indolent, and dissipated.
Just as a storm cannot
prevail
Against a rocky mountain,So Mara can never overpower the one
Who lives meditating on the impurities,
Who is controlled in his senses,
Moderate in eating, and filled
With faith and earnest effort.
Ultimately, though, Buddha advises us not
to take any part of us as constituting a self, as both mind & body can be
seen to be natural processes largely out of our control. Moreover, we can see
that these human forms are ephemeral if we take the time to actually observe
the human condition with discernment. One day, you will cease to be, and when
the last day arrives, do you want to live with regret in your heart, having
lived in states of animosity & conflict? Is this how you wish to be
remembered: as someone who created much pain & suffering? Buddha promotes
the opposite to this, for not only will you help create a better world by
settling disputes fairly & swiftly, but you’ll be remembered more
favourably as well.
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Buddha on Self-View
"Blessed
One, how does self-view come about?"
(Buddha from the Maha-punnama Sutta, Majjhima Nikaya 109, Tipitaka. Notes: ‘Self-identity view’ (sakkaya-ditthi) is a barrier to awakening to our true nature; ‘noble ones’ indicates enlightened beings; Dharma here indicates both understanding & application of Buddhist teachings.)
"There
is the case, monk, where an uninstructed, run-of-the-mill person — who has no
regard for noble ones, is not well-versed or disciplined in their Dharma; who
has no regard for men of integrity, is not well-versed or disciplined in their
Dharma — assumes form to be the self, or the self as possessing form, or form
as in the self, or the self as in form.
"He
assumes feeling to be the self, or the self as possessing feeling, or feeling
as in the self, or the self as in feeling. He assumes perception to be the
self, or the self as possessing perception, or perception as in the self, or
the self as in perception. He assumes mental-formations to be the self, or the
self as possessing mental-formations, or mental-formations as in the self, or
the self as in mental-formations. He assumes consciousness to be the self, or
the self as possessing consciousness, or consciousness as in the self, or the
self as in consciousness.
"This,
monk, is how self-view comes about."
Saying,
"Very good, Blessed One," the monk delighted & approved of the
Blessed One's words and then asked him a further question: "Blessed One, how does self-view
no longer come about?"
"There
is the case, monk, where a well-instructed disciple of the noble ones — who has
regard for noble ones, is well-versed & disciplined in their Dharma; who
has regard for men of integrity, is well-versed & disciplined in their Dharma
— does not assume form to be the self, or the self as possessing form, or form
as in the self, or the self as in form.
"He
does not assume feeling to be the self or the self as possessing feeling, or
feeling as in the self, or the self as in feeling. He does not assume
perception to be the self, or the self as possessing perception, or perception
as in the self, or the self as in perception. He does not assume mental-formations
to be the self, or the self as possessing mental-formations, or mental-formations
as in the self, or the self as in mental-formations. He does not assume
consciousness to be the self, or the self as possessing consciousness, or
consciousness as in the self, or the self as in consciousness.
"This,
monk, is how self-view no longer comes about."
(Buddha from the Maha-punnama Sutta, Majjhima Nikaya 109, Tipitaka. Notes: ‘Self-identity view’ (sakkaya-ditthi) is a barrier to awakening to our true nature; ‘noble ones’ indicates enlightened beings; Dharma here indicates both understanding & application of Buddhist teachings.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)